The Missionary Position: NGOs and Development in Africa(This article is a description of “The
Missionary Postion: NGOs and Development in Africa” by
by Firoze Manji and Carl O'Coill. (August 2002) Development NGOs operating in Africa have inadvertently
become part of the neo-liberal global agenda, serving to
undermine the battle for social justice and human rights in
much the same way as their missionary predecessors, argues a
paper in the July issue of International Affairs. The
paper says that the contribution of NGOs to relieving
poverty is minimal, while they play a "significant
role" in undermining the struggle of African people to
emancipate themselves from economic, social and political
oppression. In this compromised position, NGOs face a stark
choice: They can move into the political domain and support
social movements that seek to challenge a social system that
benefits a few and impoverishes the majority; or they can
continue unchanged and thus become complicit in a system
that leaves the majority in misery. Entitled 'The Missionary Position: NGOs and Development
in Africa', and co-authored by Firoze Manji and Carl O'Coill,
the paper traces the emergence and role of NGOs on the
continent from their missionary beginnings through to the
discourse of 'development' that emerged in the
post-independence period and the later influence of
structural adjustment programs and globalization. Beginning
in colonial Africa, the paper argues that missionary
organizations played a key role in winning the ideological
war that supported the colonial apparatus. "While
colonial philanthropy may have been motivated by religious
conviction, status, compassion or guilt, it was also
motivated by fear. In Britain and the colonies alike,
politicians frequently alluded to the threat of revolution
and actively encouraged greater interest in works of
benevolence as a solution to social unrest. In short,
charity was not only designed to help the poor, it also
served to protect the rich." In some cases, charitable organizations
"actively" helped to suppress anti-colonial
struggles, as was the case in Kenya, where the Women's
Association, Maendeleo Ya Wanawake (MYWO) and the Christian
Council of Kenya (CCK) were both involved in
government-funded schemes designed to subvert black
resistance during the 'Mau Mau' uprising. But independence created a crisis for these organizations
because they had in many cases opposed nationalistic
tendencies. However, instead of dying a natural death they
were in fact able to prosper - a result Manji and O'Coill
argue was due to the emergence of the 'development NGO' on
the national and international stage. Independence, they argue, had forced missionary societies
and charitable organizations to reinvent their attitude of
'trusteeship' associated with colonial oppression. They did
this by replacing white staff with black and revamping their
ideological outlook by appropriating the new discourse on
'development' in place of overt racism. The difference was in name only, say the authors.
Development discourse was flawed from the beginning because
non-Western people were defined by their divergence from
Western cultural standards. "While the vision of
'development' appeared to offer a more inclusive path to
'progress' than had previously been the case, in fact the
discourse was little more than a superficial reformulation
of old colonial prejudices." However, during this time period NGOs were regarded by
development agencies as playing a peripheral role in
development, with the state assuming overarching
responsibility for this role. This meant that the role of
NGOs in the post-independent period remained marginal. This was set to change with a new set of political
circumstances that led to a boom in NGOs on the continent.
The late 1970s saw the rise to power of Margaret Thatcher in
the UK and Ronald Reagan in the US, with both leaders
championing the concept of the minimalist state. According
to this outlook the state had to take a backseat in
development and create the economic conditions for the
accumulation of wealth by a minority. The rest of society
would begin to benefit when growth "trickled down"
from the wealthy. This neo-liberal agenda
"radically" altered the landscape of development
practice say Manji and O'Coill. African countries were at this time heavily in debt and
this gave the multilateral lending agencies the leverage
they needed to impose their neo-liberal policy demands,
something that was not always popular with African people.
Manji and O'Coill argue that unhappiness with economic
adjustment and its polices was often widespread and led to
demonstrations that were sometimes violently suppressed. The
protests in turn led to an attempt by lending agencies to
present a "human face" to their policies. What
emerged was the 'good governance' agenda of the 1990s and
the decision to co-opt NGOs and other civil society
organizations to a repackaged program of welfare provision. NGOs suddenly found themselves in the situation where
they usurped the state as the provider of social services to
the 'vulnerable' and became the beneficiaries of funds
intended to mitigate the inequalities of adjustment
policies. This had a "profound" impact on the
sector and together with an increase in their function as a
conduit for government aid led to dramatic growth in the
number of NGOs in Africa. Globalization therefore led to a "loss of
authority" by African states over social development
and policy. At the same time, Manji and O'Coill point out,
social conditions worsened because of external controls over
areas such as health, education and welfare measures and
social programmes, tax concessions on profits,
liberalisation of price controls, and dismantling of state
owned enterprises. In fact, development appears to have failed, says the
paper, with real per capita GDP falling and welfare gains
achieved after independence reversed. Per-capita incomes in
Sub-Saharan Africa fell by 21 percent in real terms between
1981 and 1989. In 16 other Sub-Saharan countries per capita
incomes were lower in 1999 than in 1975. The situation in which NGOs thrived, was therefore one of
continued poverty and an increase in armed conflict.
"As African governments increasingly become pushed into
becoming caretakers of what might be described as the
peripheral Bantustans of globalization, are we seeing a
return to the colonial paradigm in which social services are
delivered on the basis of favor or charity and their power
to placate?" Manji and O'Coill state that NGOs have come to be
preferred to the state as providers of services.
"Development NGOs have become an integral, and
necessary, part of a system that sacrifices respect for
justice and rights. They have taken the 'missionary
position' - service delivery, running projects that are
motivated by charity, pity and doing things for people
(implicitly who can't do it for themselves), albeit with the
verbiage of participatory approaches." Manji and O'Coill use the example of apartheid South
Africa to illustrate the choice open to NGOs. NGOs either
supported the emerging movements that aimed to topple the
Nationalist regime or they kept quiet -- a position
tantamount to complicity with a system of exploitation. "The challenge that both local and Western NGOs face
in making this choice will be that funding - at least from
the bilateral and multilateral agencies - will not
necessarily be forthcoming to support the struggle for
emancipation. But then, one would hardly have expected the
apartheid regime in South Africa to have funded the movement
that brought about the downfall of the regime," the
paper concludes. (Published in International Affairs, 78:3
(2002) 567-83.) The Pambazuka Newsletter is an advocacy tool for social justice published by Kabissa, Fahamu and Sangonet. The Newsletter reaches 10604 individuals in NGOs, international organizations and networks, funding agencies and foundations, governments, and the private sector The newsletter is designed specifically for those working in Africa, under conditions where accessing the internet can be difficult. To subscribe to the email newsletter. Africa Page - Hunger Notes Home Page
Back to Africa Page - Hunger Notes Home Page copyright |